How the Colts can Fix the Offensive Line
No unit on the football field lives and dies by the concept that a chain is only as strong as its weakest link more than the offensive line. When one player screws up an assignment along the line it can cause a total breakdown in protection.
Since Tarik Glenn retired following the 2006 Super Bowl Championship season, the Colts have played at least one offensive lineman out of position. Charlie Johnson, the Colts starting left tackle in 2009 and 2010, is not a true NFL-caliber left tackle and was not acquired to play that position. He had success at right tackle in the Super Bowl when Ryan Diem went down with an injury and has looked good at the guard positions, but left tackle is asking Johnson to play over his head.
Over the same period, right tackle Ryan Diem’s performance has steadily regressed. He is no longer capable of consistently protecting Peyton Manning against competent pass rushers and is too inconsistent run blocking. One could argue that some of his struggles may be from a revolving door at right guard, but even then it is clear from one-on-one match-ups on the outside that Diem is no longer able to get the job done.
Colts President Bill Polian attempted to prepare for the future in 2008 when he drafted three interior offensive linemen in one draft. The year prior he traded the 2008 first round pick to move up in the 2007 draft to select Tony Ugoh in the second round as the left tackle of the future. The problem is that Ugoh is no longer on the team and never lived up to expectations, second round pick Mike Pollak has failed to hold down a starting position at right guard in 2009 and 2010, sixth round pick Steve Justice was cut after his rookie season, and seventh round pick Jamey Richard has only had success at center on a limited basis.
Following 2009, the front office chose to cut long-time starting left guard Ryan Lilja. The stated rationale was that Lilja’s knee injury, which held him out of the entire 2008 season, posed lingering concerns. Unfortunately, Lilja played the entire year in Kansas City and would have easily started in Indianapolis if he was retained.
The team’s most consistent offensive linemen are an aging Jeff Saturday, whose replacement will need to be ready no later than 2012, and 2009 undrafted free agent acquisition Kyle DeVan, who has had success at left and right guard over the last two seasons.
These observations suggest that the Colts need numerous starting caliber offensive linemen from the 2011 NFL Draft, trades, or free agency. However, moving the current players on the roster around could very well go a long way in addressing much of the line’s concerns.
First, acquiring a legitimate left tackle via trade or the first round of the upcoming draft (trading up if necessary) will allow Charlie Johnson to move to a position more in line with his skills. Second, undrafted free agent Jeff Linkenbach proved two things in 2010. One, he is not suited to play guard. Two, he consistently had success at left and right tackle when he had opportunities to start on the outside — including a solid performance against Jets, in place of an injured Diem.
Adding a new left tackle, inserting Linkenbach at right tackle, moving Johnson in to right guard, and keeping Saturday and DeVan as starters should noticeably improve the offensive line.
There are other questions that may yet be answered in the off-season with players already on the roster. Jacques McClendon was added in the fourth round of the 2010 NFL Draft and has been developing at guard, center, and as an emergency tight end. If he develops as the Colts hope, he could compete for a starting spot on the interior of the line in 2011.
Jaimie Thomas is a bigger option at guard as well, and has spent the last two seasons developing after he was selected in the seventh round of the 2009 NFL Draft. Joe Reitz was added to the practice squad after he spent one week on the active roster — Week 1. He was acquired off of waivers from the Miami Dolphins who had acquired Reitz off of waivers from the Baltimore Ravens. Each of these teams entered the 2010 season with two of the top offensive lines in the NFL. If Reitz takes to the Colts system he should be competition for tackle depth — and possibly the starting right tackle spot.
The problem with this approach is that the Colts gamble to not aggressively address the offensive line after Bill Polian placed a lot of blame on the line for costing the Colts the 2009 Super Bowl has proven to be a mistake. Doing so for a second season in a row, hoping that developing players work out, could put the Colts right back in the same position seven months from now.
With so few positions of need leading up to the 2011 Draft, it makes more sense to pick three or four offensive linemen in the draft. Additionally, cutting Diem — or drastically lowering his salary — may work out to give Indianapolis enough room to make a trade or acquire a veteran free agent. No matter what direction the team chooses to take with Diem — who may deserve a shot to compete for a starting guard spot — an aggressive strategy to bolster the offensive line is the only acceptable strategy.
If the Colts enter the new season with a offensive line that consistently provides Peyton Manning with time to scan the field and can open holes for an efficient ground game, Indianapolis will be a scary opponent for any team. If Polian and company fail to address the problem for a second season, not only with the Colts offense suffer, but the line’s future will become an even bigger looming concern.
Print article | This entry was posted by Brett Mock on January 11, 2011 at 8:00 am, and is filed under Off-Season Coverage. Follow any responses to this post through . You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed. |
Well, I sincerely hope that they realize how dire the offensive line situation is and that they're bringing in these guys to be a part of a rather large initial group of offensive linemen for the summer activities. However, seeing us making moves to pick up no-name offensive linemen this early worries me a bit because the no-name/cheap route is part of what got us to where we are in the first place. We'll have to see what happens prior to the draft to have a better idea of the significance of their signings.
A couple of things:
1. I think you are over selling how well Linkenbach played tackle. He was way outmatched whenever he had to deal with an athletic defensive end. I think he makes a nice backup, but nothing more. Having said that, a nice backup may be better than Diem. This is more a comment on how Diem played then Linkenbach.
2. I think you fail to take into account how well Pollack played towards the end of the season. It's true he started the season horribly but at the end of the year he was starting to look decent.
3. Saturday is almost as much of a liability as Charlie Johnson at this point. The Colts have been hiding this quite a bit by giving him double teams with a guard, but it only isolates our bad tackles that much more. I hate to say it, but Saturday's replacement needs to be on the field next year (or maybe the year after).
4. I like Charlie Johnson for the team, as he can play all the line positions and that versatility is great in a backup. But he is not a better guard than either Devan or Pollack at this point.
I haven't seen the draft info yet, but I would be shocked if there is a solid franchise left tackle available in this years draft where the Colts will be drafting. It is all well and good to say that the Colts should trade to get one without mentioning the cost.
I think at the minimum you should point out what draft picks (or players) you would give up to get a legitimate LT cause they don't come around very often, and when they do, they cost.
Actually there are a number of points my statistics disagree with.
1) Jeff Linkenbach had significantly less negative blocks than either Diem or Johnson. He also had significantly more positive blocks than either Diem or Johnson. While Diem and Johnson averaged between 61% and 54% good blocks and 21% to 28% bad blocks, Linkenbach averaged 70.9% good blocks and 10.4% bad blocks. This is a huge difference. Every occasion he played OT he recorded the best game results of any OT in any game for the Colts this year. AND Linkenbach is also a rookie, and on a number of occasions filled in for a starter on short notice, and while having to learn both Right and Left Tackles and Right Guard. Its just my opinon, but I don't think Brett is overselling Link. So long as he continues to mature in a respectable fashion, he could be one of the rare UDFA gems.
2) I think the success in the running game at the end of the season artificially inflated the perception of Pollak. While the running was better, and yes Pollak played "better" than his average over the last 4 games, he still managed to perform worse than Jamey Richard did at the start of the year, and was still considerably worse than Kyle DeVan's worse game. The blocking by the left side this season has averaged 5.3 yards per carry, while blocking on the right side has averaged 2.8 yards per carry. Pollak continues to have a double digit percentage of negative blocks every single game, and continues to struggle to average above 65% good blocks, which seems to be the barest minimum for good blocking from either a guard or center. Just for comparison's sake, Jeff Saturday averaged 79.2% good blocks and 7.9% bad blocks, while Kyle DeVan averaged 86.5% good blocks and 6.3% bad blocks. Mike Pollak averaged 65.6% good blocks and 19.8% bad blocks, and even over the past 5 games he's averaged 69.8% good blocks and 16.4% bad blocks. No matter how you split it, Mike Pollak has not been a good guard this year. Even the marginal improvement in his performance at the end of the season was still significantly worse than every other guard the Colts used, including Jamey Richard and Jeff Linkenbach (both of whom averaged over 70% good blocks, and under 15% bad blocks).
3) Saturday started off the year playing exceptionally, by blocking at over 90% good and 5% bad. His average has taken quite a big hit as the Colts tried to remedy the Mike Pollak problem, and then again at the end of the season when he seemed to just run out of gas. But even on Saturday's worse day, Pollak still was worse by a large margain. Saturday just seems to be showing his age. While it will probably be necessary for the Colts to have a replacement ready (either Jamey Richard or Jacques McClendon or some rookie yet to be drafted), because I do not think Saturday is going last much longer.
Anyway, that is just my opinion, and is based off of what I've seen from in depth review of the games. The Colts will have their own opinions on the play of the linemen and the areas which are necessary to make significant changes too. It will be interesting to see where the team focuses, but I do not think it will be possible to get a stud OT in this draft. The talent is all late-1st round through mid-2nd round, all fo which will probably end up being high draft picks as teams reach to shore up their offensive lines.
I have more faith in McClendon than Thomas to contribute next season. It seems like the team made a half hearted attempt to improve the line this season by bringing in Terry, which obviously didn't work.
With the SB in Indy I'm hoping Isray and Polian pull out all the stops, even if it goes against the Colts philosophy of not bringing in high priced FA's.
I think you're spot on with your evaluation. We can only hope the Colts feel the same way.
Brett, what do you make of the Colts' signings of Mike Tepper and Casey Bender?